SEPARTMENT CF THE SAVY
r me CO COPECCTION OF MAYS mmc eye
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No: NR9162-14
a Fin eee 1 AAA A
4 ts he ee ee — eo
Dear Staff sergeant aaa
This is in reference to your application for your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of ti
United States Code, section 1552.
orrection o
le 10 of th
@ Fh
C
£
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 December 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
C
a “ a i
regulations ana procedures appilt e
Board. Documentary materia+ CONS r
of vour application, together with al
support thereof, your naval record ana
regulations and policies. In additio
report of the Headquarters Marine Cor
Evaluation Review Board (PERB), gate
di
advisory opinion from HOMC dated 10 Sep
which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence
insufficient to establish the existence of probable materi
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substa 4
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB
and the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O’NETLL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9364 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11670 14
Bb three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9929 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09114-08
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 7 May 2008, Applicant submitted a request to the Board of Corrections of Naval Records (BCNR) to have his fitness report removed on the grounds that he was not afforded the opportunity to present his case to the CRC or defend himself with legal counsel. The rebuttal to the report was the petitioner’s best...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8253 14
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03475-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The petitioner submitted evidence that defended che actions for which he was charged at NUP. Although the petitioner offers extenuating circumstances for his guilty plea, the fact remains that he did indeed accept NJP, and plead and was found guilty.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05438-10
'A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your a application on 12 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04391-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 30 April 2008, a copy of which is attached. The Board found that since the Page i1 entry is not a part of her record, it cannot be considered when adjudicating this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8517 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Fvaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 22 October 2013, and the advisory opinion from HQMC dated 8 January 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR2108 15
Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.